It's only day 3 of SXSW and i'm tired of the jargony terms "disruption" and "innovation". (Both in my own title!) They're everywhere this year. Every company wants to be innovative, and many are. Some companies have the capacity or interest in fostering their own disruption. This is, of course, harder. There's no buzzy product this year as in prior SXSWs -- no Twitter or Foursquare. This year the buzz is about using lean methodologies and about being disruptive. Eric Ries' Lean day was SRO.
Innovation is not disruption. But i'll save the semantic blog post for another day.
As I seek to help Adobe by disrupting Adobe, I constantly feel like a child, with Adobe as my parent. I believe the metaphor is pretty good, so i'll push it;
Adults have mortgages and jobs and dependents and responsibility. They're a little jaded. They've seen it all. They know a ton. It's not that they don't WANT to be fun and frivolous, but they are mature enough to understand that keeping your job is important. The family depends on you.
Parents were once kids, but now they're all grown up. And no matter how much they loved rock n' roll back in the day, swearing they'd remember, their children's music feels like noise.
But kids have a different job. They not only cannot behave like adults, they shouldn't. Kids' job is to grow and learn. They have to learn to speak, they learn math, history, reading. They learn by imitation and they learn by experimentation. Trial and error. It's impossible to learn without having a safe place to try and fail. They need to be somewhat irresponsible. Kids make mistakes. They are naive and don't know the rules. Sure they learn them and the hope is they don't hurt themselves or others in the process, but the crux of the kid's job is to experiment, to try and to fail often.
And a parent's role is not to hamper this process. The parents' job is to give broad boundaries and otherwise encourage this risky behavior in as safe a space as possible. Too much restriction, and all parents know what will happen -- rebellion -- usually dangerous. Just as most companies would love to innovate profoundly and avoid being disrupted by competition in a changing landscape, parents all want to be good parents with great self-reliant kids; but it's harder than it looks -- to create that space, to let go of that control, to love them anyway. Kids generally want to make their parents proud and have meaningful lives.
I'm okay being at kid at Adobe. I'm optimistic that Adobe will be a great parent.

2 comments:
It really depends on the business and the industry. The larger the company, the more lip service is paid to "profound innovation" since that kind of talk serves sales and marketing objectives well. Actual calls for meaningful change internally, aside from obsessive restructuring for the sake of it, is harder to achieve.
"The young do not know enough to
be prudent, and therefore they attempt
the impossible -- and achieve it,
generation after generation."
- Pearl S. Buck
Post a Comment